Dhito vs Raycast
Last updated
The short answer
On file search, this is not close. Raycast keeps its own local index, but it is a name-and-metadata index — it matches the characters you type, not what a file means. To search inside file contents it defers to the operating system: Raycast's manual states Content Search "uses your operating system's built-in search index" and only works when that index is healthy and covers your configured folders. Neither path matches on meaning, reads what is in an image, or hears what was said in a recording. Dhito does all three on-device and answers questions from documents with citations. Raycast wins a different contest — it is an excellent launcher, and Dhito is not one.
Dhito vs Raycast at a glance
| Raycast | Dhito | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Productivity launcher and command palette | Local AI file search and document QA |
| File search index | Own name index; Spotlight for file contents | Own local vector index, matched by meaning |
| Finds synonyms and rephrasings | No | Yes |
| Searches image contents | No | Yes, local vision model |
| Searches audio and video speech | No | Yes, local Whisper transcripts |
| AI processing | Cloud (Raycast Pro, OpenAI/Anthropic models) | Entirely on-device |
| Extensions and automation | Hundreds, plus a store | None |
| Launches apps and windows | Yes, this is the point | No |
| Cost | Free tier; Pro $8/user/month billed annually | $4.99/month after a 14-day trial |
| Hardware | Any Mac; also on Windows | Apple Silicon only, macOS 13+ |
The one fact that decides this comparison
Raycast does maintain its own file index, and it is worth being precise about that because it is often described wrongly. Per Raycast's manual, that index is local to your device and never uploaded — but it is a name and metadata index. For searching inside file contents, Raycast defers to the OS: Content Search "uses your operating system's built-in search index (Spotlight on macOS, Windows Search on Windows)", and the manual notes it "only works when that index is healthy and covers your File Search folders" — if Spotlight is not indexing those folders, Content Search is disabled outright.
Either way the matching is lexical. Search *"expenses"* in Raycast and Q2_Costs_Writeup.pdf does not appear, for exactly the reason it does not appear in Spotlight: no character match, and no concept of a synonym in either index.
Dhito's index holds something different. It stores what your files *mean*, as vectors from a local embedding model, alongside transcripts of your recordings and captions for your images. Different index, different failure modes — which is the only thing that changes the outcome.
Where Raycast is genuinely better
This is not a close call in Raycast's own territory, and pretending otherwise would be useless to you.
- Launching and window management. Raycast opens apps, resizes windows, and runs quick calculations faster than anything else on the Mac. Dhito does none of this.
- Extensions. Hundreds of them, covering GitHub, Linear, Jira, Spotify, and roughly everything with an API. There is a store and a real developer community behind it.
- Clipboard history and snippets. Small features you end up using fifty times a day.
- Cross-platform. Raycast runs on Intel Macs and now on Windows. Dhito is Apple Silicon only, with Windows in development.
Where Dhito is genuinely better
- Search that survives your phrasing. Conceptual queries work: *"the policy on remote work"* finds
Employee Handbook 2026.pdf. - Media is not a black box. Whisper transcribes recordings locally and a vision model captions images, so both become searchable by what is in them. A query can land on the 45-minute mark of a call.
- Document questions, answered offline. Ask what the budget cap in section 3 was and get an answer with the page cited — from a model running on your Neural Engine.
- No cloud round trip for AI. Raycast's AI features send prompts and context to OpenAI or Anthropic. That is a reasonable trade for general assistance and an unreasonable one for a client contract. If the files are subject to GDPR or HIPAA, the distinction is not academic.
The cost of running both
Raycast Pro is $8 per user per month billed annually, $10 monthly, with an Advanced AI add-on on top. Dhito is $4.99/month. Raycast's free tier is genuinely capable, so the realistic stack for most people is free Raycast plus Dhito — a launcher that costs nothing and a search index that costs less than one cloud AI subscription.
Set them up so they do not collide: leave Raycast on its usual hotkey and give Dhito a second one. They index different things and never contend for the same query.
The verdict
For finding files, Dhito wins decisively — Raycast queries the same index that was already failing you. For launching apps and automating your desktop, Raycast wins, and Dhito does not enter that category at all. The strongest setup is free Raycast as the launcher plus Dhito as the search index, which costs less than Raycast Pro alone.
Who should use what
Your file searches come back empty
Dhito
Both of Raycast's paths are lexical — its own name index, and Spotlight for file contents. Neither resolves a synonym, so a rephrased query still returns nothing.
You work with recordings and screenshots
Dhito
Raycast does not look inside media at all. On-device transcription and image captioning is a capability it does not have at any price tier.
Your documents are confidential
Dhito
Raycast's AI sends prompts and context to third-party model providers. Dhito's inference never leaves the Mac — not as a setting, but because there is no cloud path to configure.
You want a launcher and automation
Raycast
Window management, clipboard history and the extension store are genuinely excellent, and Dhito does none of them. Its free tier covers this, so run it alongside.
Honest limitations
Where Dhito falls short
- No launcher, no window management, no clipboard history, no snippets — it does not try to be a command palette, and Raycast is better at all of it.
- No extension ecosystem and no scripting API.
- Apple Silicon only, macOS 13 Ventura or newer. Raycast runs on Intel Macs and on Windows; Dhito for Windows is in development with a waitlist.
- The first pass over a large library takes hours, because transcription and captioning are genuine inference work. Raycast has no indexing wait because it does no indexing.
- Local files only. It does not reach into Notion, Gmail, Linear, or anything behind an API.
- No free tier beyond the 14-day trial, whereas Raycast's free tier is genuinely capable.
Where Raycast falls short
- Its own file index matches names and metadata, not meaning, so a query phrased differently from the file returns nothing.
- Searching inside file contents is not its own index at all: per Raycast's manual, Content Search uses the OS built-in index and is disabled entirely when Spotlight is not indexing your configured folders.
- It does not index image contents, audio, or video speech at any tier.
- AI features require Pro and send prompts and context to cloud model providers — a real constraint for confidential documents.
- Pro is $8/user/month annually or $10 monthly, with the Advanced AI add-on billed on top of that, so a full AI setup costs several times Dhito's $4.99.
- Built on a web technology stack, so it carries a heavier memory footprint than Alfred.
Frequently asked questions
Can Raycast find files that Spotlight cannot?
Not in the way that matters, though the mechanism is worth stating correctly. Raycast keeps its own local file index — the manual is explicit that it stays on your device — but it indexes names and metadata, so it matches characters rather than meaning. Searching inside file contents is a separate feature, Content Search, and that one "uses your operating system's built-in search index" per the same manual, and is disabled when Spotlight is not covering your folders. So Raycast is faster and more keyboard-friendly than Spotlight, but a search that fails because your words differ from the file's words fails in both.
Does Raycast AI run locally?
No. Raycast's AI features are cloud-based, routing prompts to providers such as OpenAI and Anthropic, and they require a Pro subscription. Dhito runs its models on your Mac's Neural Engine, so no prompt or file content is transmitted.
Should I run Raycast and Dhito together?
That is the setup we would recommend. Use Raycast as your launcher and automation layer, and Dhito as the search index for documents, recordings and images. Give them separate hotkeys — Raycast on Option + Space and Dhito on another, or the reverse — and they never compete for the same query.
Which is cheaper?
Raycast has a capable free tier, so if you only need the launcher it costs nothing. Raycast Pro is $8 per user per month billed annually or $10 monthly, plus an optional Advanced AI add-on. Dhito is $4.99 per month with a 14-day trial. Free Raycast plus Dhito is the cheapest complete stack.
Does Dhito have extensions like Raycast?
No. Dhito has no extension store, no scripting API, and no plugin model. It does one job — searching and questioning your local files — and the entire product is built around that. If extensibility is what you want, Raycast is the answer.
Raycast runs on Intel Macs and Windows. Does Dhito?
No. Dhito requires Apple Silicon (M1 or later) on macOS 13 Ventura or newer, because the models run on the Neural Engine. There is no Intel build. A Windows version is in development and there is a waitlist for beta invites.
Read more
Try Dhito on your own files
Fourteen days free, no account required to search. Point it at one folder and run the query that made you go looking for an alternative in the first place.