Dhito vs Raycast
Last updated
The short answer
On file search, this is not close. Raycast keeps its own local index, but it is a name-and-metadata index — it matches the characters you type, not what a file means. To search inside file contents it defers to the operating system: Raycast's manual states Content Search "uses your operating system's built-in search index" and only works when that index is healthy and covers your configured folders. Neither path matches on meaning, reads what is in an image, or hears what was said in a recording. Dhito does all three on-device and answers questions from documents with citations. Raycast still wins on breadth: window management, clipboard history, snippets and the extension store are its ground and Dhito does none of them — though Dhito launches apps and matches them by what they are for rather than only by name, and ships around 45 local file tools that Raycast reaches only through extensions.
Dhito vs Raycast at a glance
| Raycast | Dhito | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Productivity launcher and command palette | Local AI file search and document QA |
| File search index | Own name index; Spotlight for file contents | Own local vector index, matched by meaning |
| Finds synonyms and rephrasings | No | Yes |
| Searches image contents | No | Yes, local vision model |
| Searches audio and video speech | No | Yes, local Whisper transcripts |
| AI processing | Cloud (Raycast Pro, OpenAI/Anthropic models) | Entirely on-device |
| Extensions and automation | Hundreds, plus a store | None |
| Launches apps | Yes, by name and alias | Yes, by name *and* by purpose — "messaging app" finds WhatsApp |
| Window management, clipboard, snippets | Yes, and it is the point | No |
| Acts on a file it found | Via extensions and scripts you add | ~45 built-in local file tools, no setup |
| Inline answers | Calculator, conversions, and AI on Pro | ~20 rows, all local but currency |
| Cost | Free tier; Pro $8/user/month billed annually | $4.99/month or $99 once, after a 14-day trial |
| Hardware | Any Mac; also on Windows | Apple Silicon only, macOS 13+ |
The one fact that decides this comparison
Raycast does maintain its own file index, and it is worth being precise about that because it is often described wrongly. Per Raycast's manual, that index is local to your device and never uploaded — but it is a name and metadata index. For searching inside file contents, Raycast defers to the OS: Content Search "uses your operating system's built-in search index (Spotlight on macOS, Windows Search on Windows)", and the manual notes it "only works when that index is healthy and covers your File Search folders" — if Spotlight is not indexing those folders, Content Search is disabled outright.
Either way the matching is lexical. Search *"expenses"* in Raycast and Q2_Costs_Writeup.pdf does not appear, for exactly the reason it does not appear in Spotlight: no character match, and no concept of a synonym in either index.
Dhito's index holds something different. It stores what your files *mean*, as vectors from a local embedding model, alongside transcripts of your recordings and captions for your images. Different index, different failure modes — which is the only thing that changes the outcome.
Where Raycast is genuinely better
This is not a close call in Raycast's own territory, and pretending otherwise would be useless to you.
- Window management and automation. Raycast resizes windows, chains scripts and runs commands faster than anything else on the Mac. Dhito does none of this — it launches apps and runs file tools, and stops there.
- Extensions. Hundreds of them, covering GitHub, Linear, Jira, Spotify, and roughly everything with an API. There is a store and a real developer community behind it.
- Clipboard history and snippets. Small features you end up using fifty times a day.
- Cross-platform. Raycast runs on Intel Macs and now on Windows. Dhito is Apple Silicon only, with Windows in development.
Where Dhito is genuinely better
- Search that survives your phrasing. Conceptual queries work: *"the policy on remote work"* finds
Employee Handbook 2026.pdf. - Media is not a black box. Whisper transcribes recordings locally and a vision model captions images, so both become searchable by what is in them. A query can land on the 45-minute mark of a call.
- Document questions, answered offline. Ask what the budget cap in section 3 was and get an answer with the page cited — from a model running on your Neural Engine.
- No cloud round trip for AI. Raycast's AI features send prompts and context to OpenAI or Anthropic. That is a reasonable trade for general assistance and an unreasonable one for a client contract. If the files are subject to GDPR or HIPAA, the distinction is not academic.
- File tools with nothing to install. Around 45 verbs ship in the box — convert HEIC to JPG, compress a PDF to a size budget, merge or split, resize, strip EXIF and GPS, watermark, extract text, checksum, zip — run from a result, a multi-selection, or by typing the verb. Raycast can do much of this too, through extensions you find, install and keep current; some of those extensions send files to a web service. Dhito's run locally and never overwrite the original, because every result is written as a new file beside it.
- Apps matched by purpose. Raycast is superb at launching an app whose name you know. Type "messaging app" into Dhito and it returns WhatsApp, Telegram and Messages — none of which has "messaging" in its name — because apps are indexed by what they are for, not just what they are called.
The cost of running both
Raycast Pro is $8 per user per month billed annually, $10 monthly, with an Advanced AI add-on on top. Dhito is $4.99/month, or $99 once for a licence that never renews. Raycast's free tier is genuinely capable, so the realistic stack for most people is free Raycast plus Dhito — a launcher that costs nothing and a search index that costs less than one cloud AI subscription.
Set them up so they do not collide: leave Raycast on its usual hotkey and give Dhito a second one. They index different things and never contend for the same query.
The verdict
For finding files, Dhito wins decisively — Raycast queries the same index that was already failing you. Dhito also launches apps by purpose rather than only by name, and acts on what it finds with around 45 built-in local file tools. But automation, window management, clipboard history, snippets and the extension store are Raycast's ground and it is better at all of them. The strongest setup is still free Raycast alongside Dhito, which costs less than Raycast Pro alone.
Who should use what
Your file searches come back empty
Dhito
Both of Raycast's paths are lexical — its own name index, and Spotlight for file contents. Neither resolves a synonym, so a rephrased query still returns nothing.
You work with recordings and screenshots
Dhito
Raycast does not look inside media at all. On-device transcription and image captioning is a capability it does not have at any price tier.
Your documents are confidential
Dhito
Raycast's AI sends prompts and context to third-party model providers. Dhito's inference never leaves the Mac — not as a setting, but because there is no cloud path to configure.
You want a launcher and automation
Raycast
Window management, clipboard history and the extension store are genuinely excellent, and Dhito does none of them. Its free tier covers this, so run it alongside.
You convert, compress or merge files often
Dhito
Around 45 file tools ship in the box and run locally, on one result or a whole multi-selection. Raycast reaches the same ground through extensions you install and maintain, some of which upload the file.
You know what an app does but not what it is called
Dhito
Raycast matches app names and aliases. Dhito indexes apps by purpose as well, so “messaging app” returns WhatsApp, Telegram and Messages. For an app whose name you do know, Raycast is faster.
Honest limitations
Where Dhito falls short
- No window management, no clipboard history, no snippets, no automation — it launches apps and runs file tools, but it does not try to be a full command palette, and Raycast is better at all of that.
- The file tools are a fixed list of around 45 verbs. There is no way to add one, script one, or chain them into a workflow the way a Raycast extension can.
- No extension ecosystem and no scripting API.
- Apple Silicon only, macOS 13 Ventura or newer. Raycast runs on Intel Macs and on Windows; Dhito for Windows is in development with a waitlist.
- The first pass over a large library takes hours, because transcription and captioning are genuine inference work. Raycast has no indexing wait because it does no indexing.
- Local files and local notes only. It indexes Apple Notes and Markdown vaults such as Obsidian, but does not reach into Notion, Gmail, Linear, or anything behind an API.
- No free tier beyond the 14-day trial, whereas Raycast's free tier is genuinely capable.
Where Raycast falls short
- Its own file index matches names and metadata, not meaning, so a query phrased differently from the file returns nothing.
- Searching inside file contents is not its own index at all: per Raycast's manual, Content Search uses the OS built-in index and is disabled entirely when Spotlight is not indexing your configured folders.
- It does not index image contents, audio, or video speech at any tier.
- Apps are matched by name and alias, so a query describing what an app is for rather than what it is called does not resolve.
- File conversion and compression are extension territory rather than built in — you find, install and maintain them yourself, and some route the file through a web service.
- AI features require Pro and send prompts and context to cloud model providers — a real constraint for confidential documents.
- Pro is $8/user/month annually or $10 monthly, with the Advanced AI add-on billed on top of that, so a full AI setup costs several times Dhito's $4.99 a month.
- Built on a web technology stack, so it carries a heavier memory footprint than Alfred.
Frequently asked questions
Can Raycast find files that Spotlight cannot?
Not in the way that matters, though the mechanism is worth stating correctly. Raycast keeps its own local file index — the manual is explicit that it stays on your device — but it indexes names and metadata, so it matches characters rather than meaning. Searching inside file contents is a separate feature, Content Search, and that one "uses your operating system's built-in search index" per the same manual, and is disabled when Spotlight is not covering your folders. So Raycast is faster and more keyboard-friendly than Spotlight, but a search that fails because your words differ from the file's words fails in both.
Does Raycast AI run locally?
No. Raycast's AI features are cloud-based, routing prompts to providers such as OpenAI and Anthropic, and they require a Pro subscription. Dhito runs its models on your Mac's Neural Engine, so no prompt or file content is transmitted.
Should I run Raycast and Dhito together?
That is the setup we would recommend. Use Raycast as your launcher and automation layer, and Dhito as the search index for documents, recordings and images. Give them separate hotkeys — Raycast on Option + Space and Dhito on another, or the reverse — and they never compete for the same query.
Which is cheaper?
Raycast has a capable free tier, so if you only need the launcher it costs nothing. Raycast Pro is $8 per user per month billed annually or $10 monthly, plus an optional Advanced AI add-on. Dhito is $4.99 per month, or $99 once for a licence that never renews, after a 14-day trial. Free Raycast plus Dhito is the cheapest complete stack.
Does Dhito have extensions like Raycast?
No. Dhito has no extension store, no scripting API, and no plugin model. What it has instead is a fixed set of around 45 file tools built into the app — convert, compress, resize, merge, split, strip EXIF, watermark, checksum, zip — which need no installation and run entirely on the machine. That is less flexible than an extension store by design: you cannot add a verb, and you cannot chain them into a workflow. If extensibility is what you want, Raycast is the answer.
Can Raycast convert or compress a file the way Dhito does?
Through extensions, yes, and there are good ones. The differences are who maintains them and where the file goes: Dhito's verbs ship with the app, run on your Mac, and never overwrite the original — every run writes a new file beside it, with the Trash as undo — whereas a Raycast extension is third-party code you install and keep current, and some of them upload the file to a web service to do the work. If that matters for the files in question, check each extension before relying on it.
Raycast runs on Intel Macs and Windows. Does Dhito?
No. Dhito requires Apple Silicon (M1 or later) on macOS 13 Ventura or newer, because the models run on the Neural Engine. There is no Intel build. A Windows version is in development and there is a waitlist for beta invites.
Read more
Try Dhito on your own files
Fourteen days free, no account required to search. Point it at one folder and run the query that made you go looking for an alternative in the first place.